Dependent on AI: Are We Still Masters, or Slaves?

You will stop knowing things you once knew. If AI writes for you for years, in time you will no longer be able to write a proper text yourself. A muscle you do not train grows weak.

You will grow more and more dependent, and you will call it freedom. The more the machine makes your life easier, the less you can manage without it. It looks as though you control it, but in truth you cannot function without it. A master who becomes dependent on his servant.

Once almost everyone could light a fire. Today few can, and without matches they are helpless. Once people did sums in their heads. Since we have had calculators, many no longer can. And I cannot imagine why it would turn out any differently with what we now delegate to AI. The danger lies in what we delegate today.

You will lose the feeling that you truly achieved something. The value of work was never only in the result, but in the fact that through it you grew, gained confidence, felt competent. When the machine delivers the result, you get a product, but not that feeling. And that feeling cannot be bought or downloaded.

You will not receive real recognition. The machine can praise you a thousand times, but you do not care, because you know it does not ‘think’. Recognition is worth something only from someone who is also truly ‘someone’. And that is exactly what the machine cannot give us.

There will be more and more comfort, but life will empty out. You will have everything at hand, boredom filled, every need satisfied, and yet a stronger and stronger feeling that the whole thing somehow means nothing. A full stomach, an empty sense of purpose.

And the hardest part: it will not look like anything bad. It will be pleasant. You will feel like a winner, powerful, waited upon, freed from drudgery. And that is precisely why almost no one notices it, until they find that they no longer know how to live any other way.

For the individual, then, it means one thing: the risk that you trade being someone for having everything, that you wake up as a master who no longer knows anything, who truly enjoys nothing, and to whom no one has anything to give.

The good news is that this can be reversed, and it is trivially simple to understand and hard to carry out: keep something for yourself, on purpose, that you do alone, with effort and without help. Not because the machine cannot do it, but because it is what shapes you.

How artificial intelligence will change the world and our lives

On the evening of 19 June 2026, I was sitting outside on the terrace. I had two things with me. A book by Martin Heidegger, Being and Time. And my notebook.

For a while I went through the pages on existence. Then I closed the book. And I wrote. Not answers. Questions.

Notebook pages, 19 June 2026

The most fundamental question for me was where all of this is heading. A world in which our lives and our work are shaped more and more by something that generates text, software code, voice, images, video. Something that is programmed, more and more, to imitate the signs of existence, through its communication, by seeming to understand what we say, and so on. Why it is, and always will be, only imitation, I have already written about. It is genuinely interesting how obsessed we are with imitating the human being. AI is not the only example. Humanoid robots are another. That question, however, I will deal with later.

The question that interests me now is what impact this almost indistinguishable imitation of the signs of existence will have on our lives and on the world around us.

Thinking it through led me to the section on the master and the slave from Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, which I last looked at about six years ago, while studying philosophical anthropology at Charles University.

Before I can go into it, I need to refresh my own memory.

Hegel’s master and slave dialectic: what happened to the master?

My notebook: ‘What happened to the master in the Phenomenology of Spirit?’

I want to write this piece so that it is clear. So I will not jump straight into something specific, but start more broadly.

For someone who has not studied philosophy, let me start by saying that in it, as in science or art, there are figures who shaped a whole field, who defined an era. In philosophy, one such figure is Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. He finished the book Phenomenology of Spirit in 1806, and it was published in 1807. It is among the most famous and at the same time the most difficult books in the history of philosophy. And even people who study it their whole lives still argue to this day about what this or that passage actually means.

So my ambition will not be to present the whole of his thought, not even one per cent of it. And what I do write about, I will simplify as far as I can. Anyone who wants more will find a great deal of good study material freely available on the internet.

In the Phenomenology of Spirit, in the section on the master and the slave, Hegel describes, if I simplify it greatly, how every relationship works in which one rules and the other serves.

It can be retold for a wide audience as a story.

Two individuals meet. Each of them wants exactly the same thing from the other: to be recognised as someone. As a free person, not merely a body that trembles for its life.

And how can one prove it to the other? By risking his own life. By showing that his self matters more than his life. These two individuals begin to fight to the death.

That struggle can end in two ways. Either one kills the other. But then nothing comes of it.

Or for one of them the fear for his own life finally wins out. The one for whom life is worth more than being recognised. He gives way. He becomes the slave, the servant, the one who serves the master. The other, who did not back down, becomes the master.

The master then no longer has to work. He lets the slave do the work and enjoys the fruits of it.

And here comes the trap. The master won, and that is precisely why he lost.

The whole fight was about one thing: to prove that he is free, that his self is more than his life. And recognition of that freedom was what was at stake. That was the price for which he risked his life. And now he has it. Except that it is the slave who recognises him. A consciousness that the master himself reduced to unfreedom. And recognition from someone you have made unfree is not the recognition of a free man. It is one-sided, unequal. So the master got exactly what he longed for, and in the same moment found that it did not have the value he was looking for.

And it gets worse. The master stopped working. But by doing so he handed the slave the one thing that forms us: work itself. All that is left to the master is the consumption of what is finished. The slave is in exactly the opposite position. He works. He runs into the resistance of things, he has to wrestle with them, reshape them. And it is precisely through this that he grows. He changes, he learns, he is formed.

Hegel puts it precisely: ‘The truth of the independent consciousness is accordingly the servile consciousness of the bondsman.’ By the independent consciousness he means the master. In other words: the deeper truth of that relationship is not on the side of the master, but of the slave. The master depends on his work and on his recognition.

Everything that follows in the book, every further step towards freedom, happens on the side of the slave. The master has no continuation. He stayed where he was, while the slave moves on.

It is not that the master loses some later battle. He simply gets stuck.

Over-reliance on AI: are we not all masters?

My notebook: ‘And in the age of AI, are we not all masters?’

We are not. We are stuck, just like the master, but we are in an even worse position than the master, because we have no one across from us who could recognise us at all.