Article
How I Became a Morning Person and Built a Productive Morning Routine
This morning, March 21, I woke up around 4 AM. Looking out over Prague, more than ten new blog post ideas rushed through my mind. I quickly reached for my phone and noted them down before they disappeared. That is just how it works for me. Calm, silence, and a fresh morning mind have a big impact on my thinking and productivity.
How to focus? In my case the answer was not a tool but a rhythm. I fixed my workday to begin at 7:30 in the morning, I kept the quiet hours between 7:30 and 9:30, before most colleagues arrive and before my inbox fills, for the work that needs the deepest thinking, and I moved interviews and check-ins to the afternoon. That single change to my daily rhythm did more for my focus than any productivity trick. What follows is how it happened.
Waking up in the very early morning, or basically at night, is nothing unusual for me. About half of the posts I have written this year started this way: I would wake up around 3 or 4 AM, start thinking about something and tell myself, “Richard, your brain is already working. You are not falling back asleep anyway.” So I would start writing.
How I Changed My Rhythm to Focus
But these early starts used to make my days pretty inconsistent. Some days I showed up at work at 9:30, others at 6:00. One night I would get eight hours of sleep, the next only three and a half. I started to feel the consequences. So I told myself: I need structure. I decided to fix my workday start at 7:30 AM. Since then, unless something truly unexpected comes up, I stick to it, arriving at the office between 7:20 and 7:40 every morning.
Waking Up at 4 AM, and How I Became a Morning Person
My mornings fall into two categories: I either wake up around 6:00 and just make it, or I wake up earlier, around 3:00 or 4:00. When that happens, thoughts start spinning, and I get into a productive focus mode that lasts until around 6:00. Then I eat and head to the office. But unlike before, I do not bounce between extremes, like waking up at 3:00 one day and 8:30 the next.
The Quiet Deep Work Hours: How I Focus at Work Before Colleagues Arrive
That quiet time in the office between 7:30 and 9:30, when most colleagues are still on their way in and my inbox is not overflowing, has significantly improved my focus and, I believe, my value to the company. Sure, leading a team means being there when people need me. But I think I can contribute the most when I use my most productive hours to solve problems, whether that is identifying a weak point in our approach or catching a data issue. That way, conversations with colleagues throughout the day are far more meaningful.
My Productive Morning Routine: The Most Demanding Work Before Noon
Part of this new rhythm is also making sure I tackle the most demanding tasks, those that require deep thinking on my part, before noon. Afternoons are mostly for check-ins with colleagues and interviews. I now offer interview slots almost exclusively in the afternoon. That is when I tend to absorb and process information rather than work through complex problems on my own. Interviews and consultations often raise critical questions, but I prefer to reflect on them in the morning. Even if I try to solve something immediately, the answer often comes to me the next day. That is just how I work.
Right now, this model works best for me. But I do not claim to have it all figured out. If you are reading this and see a weak point in my approach, or have something that works better for you, I would love to hear from you. To me, getting your rhythm and energy right during the day is a crucial factor, not only for success, but for actually living a good, meaningful life.
PS: And if you are thinking “just do not wake up that early,” I appreciate the thought; now please go convince my brain to stop working at 3 AM.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
How to focus during the working day?
How to do deep work?
What is deep work?
How to become a morning person?
What are the benefits of waking up early?
More articles
Are you a content creator playing by the rules of YouTube, Instagram or Google? Are you a small business owner whose business model depends on how often Amazon recommends you, how expensive Facebook ad impressions will be or how expensive Google Ads clicks will be? If all or most of your contact with your audience or customers depends on a big platform showing you to them, you are not in a strong position.
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.

I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.

I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.

Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.

