The Risk–Reward Principle I Didn’t Explain Clearly in My Article on Cyclical Opportunities
If I take a certain risk, how much can I gain — and how much can I lose?
1 March 2026
484
484
Hi, I’m Richard. On this blog I share my thoughts, not investment advice. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell securities.
European Sales Under the Microscope – The Impact of the Boycott on American Brands
European boycott, American brands, sales
Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00
March 2025
We’re about to enter earnings season for Q1 2025, and this time the numbers might carry more weight than usual. For the first time, they’ll reflect the impact of something that swept across Europe earlier this year — a consumer boycott of American brands. On social platforms like X and Threads, I was bombarded daily with posts about boycotting Tesla and other US companies, many of them racking up thousands of reactions.
We still can’t say how much of this translated into stock prices. Recent price drops might be linked to the boycotts — or to U.S. political turbulence, Elon Musk’s polarizing public statements, fears of a trade war, or simply a market correction after a period of hype-fueled growth. That growth had pushed valuations of many tech firms to levels reminiscent of the dot-com bubble.
The real answer will come with the numbers — and they’ll shine a spotlight directly on European revenue declines.
What Actually Happened? Europe’s Relationship with Elon Musk and the U.S.
At the beginning of the year, calls to boycott American brands started popping up across multiple European countries — particularly in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Belgium.
or just this article
Get the full article by email and feel free to reply if you want to discuss it further.
Disclaimer
This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, or a guarantee of future market performance. The views expressed are solely those of the author, who may also be an investor. Investing in financial markets involves risk, and each reader should make their own decisions independently and, if necessary, consult with a licensed professional.
Summary
Q1 2025 earnings show the first measurable impact of a European consumer boycott on American brands — Tesla in particular. Concentrated in Germany, France, Netherlands, and Belgium. Whether it's the boycott, politics, or the trade war remains an open question.
Common questions about this topic?
What triggered the European boycott of American brands in early 2025?
The boycott emerged from a combination of geopolitical frustrations, corporate stances on social issues, and the perception that some American CEOs were out of touch with European public sentiment. It spread across multiple countries — particularly Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Belgium — through viral social media campaigns. Tesla became the primary symbol, largely due to Elon Musk's increasingly polarising public image.
How significant was the impact on Tesla sales in Europe?
Early data suggested the impact was substantial. In the article, the boycott is described as potentially more than symbolic, with preliminary signals indicating real sales declines. Subsequent reporting confirmed sharp drops: Tesla registrations fell 76% in Germany and 45% in France in February 2025. The question explored in the article is whether Q1 2025 earnings would confirm a deeper, longer-term shift in European consumer sentiment.
Could the European boycott actually affect stock prices?
In the article, this is presented as an open question. Recent price drops could be linked to the boycotts, or to U.S. political turbulence, trade war fears, or simply a market correction after a period of hype-fueled growth that pushed valuations to levels reminiscent of the dot-com bubble. The real answer, as stated in the article, would come with the Q1 2025 earnings numbers — specifically through European revenue data.
Is the boycott driven by politics or by consumer preference?
Both. In the article, the causes are described as varied: geopolitical frustrations, perceptions of corporate arrogance, and genuine disagreement with the public positions of certain CEOs. The viral nature of the movement — videos, logo covering, alternative comparisons — suggests it tapped into a broader sentiment beyond any single political issue. Whether it persists depends on whether the underlying frustrations are resolved or deepened.
What makes this boycott different from previous consumer movements?
In the article, the distinguishing factor is the combination of social media virality with measurable financial impact arriving at the same time as earnings season. Previous boycotts often faded before they could be measured in corporate results. This time, the timing aligned: calls for boycotts started in January, built through February, and Q1 earnings — the first period that could reflect the impact — were about to be reported.
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Newsletter
New articles to your inbox