Article
Robert Fico: Dividing Slovak Families Through Politics
Returning to Slovakia after spending time in Prague, I immediately felt the growing division that has gripped the nation. Under Robert Fico's leadership, policies such as questioning Slovakia's EU membership and shifting the country's foreign policy have polarized not only political discourse but also personal relationships. The result is a fractured society where even family gatherings often become battlegrounds for ideological clashes. While I strongly disagree with Fico's approach, this piece is not about his policies. Instead, it focuses on the societal rift that has widened under his leadership.
The fragmentation of information sources has created two parallel realities, where opposing groups interpret the political landscape through completely different lenses. This polarization has become a significant obstacle to constructive dialogue, leaving little room for mutual understanding.
I see this even within my own family. Increasingly, I question whether it is worth engaging in debates with relatives about their political views. Is the cost—whether it is heated arguments, sleepless nights, or strained relationships—worth it? For instance, is it worth upsetting my 85-year-old grandmother, who immediately ties any criticism of Robert Fico's government to her belief that younger generations are ungrateful? She often recalls how she had to make do with little in her youth, sewing her own clothes and managing everything on her own, and views today's generation as incapable of such self-reliance. Is it worth causing her sleepless nights or even raising her blood pressure over these discussions?
This raises a critical question: should we even discuss politics within our families? At first glance, this dilemma seems to present a painful choice between familial love and safeguarding the fundamental principles on which our republic and society are built.
Continue reading
Enter your email to unlock this article and join the newsletter. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Who is Robert Fico and why is he controversial?
Why is Slovak society so deeply divided?
How does political polarisation in Slovakia compare to other European countries?
What role does media fragmentation play in Slovak politics?
How has Slovakia's foreign policy shifted under Fico since 2023?
Is political division in Slovakia affecting everyday life?
Related articles
It happens every day. It is happening right now.
Manipulation without the feeling of being manipulated is the most effective kind.
How can we expect to come to terms with history or learn from it if we do that?
More articles
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task — something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.
Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.
The moment other people needed access to it, the problem changed completely. It was no longer about whether the agent could learn. It was about who gets to teach it.
I wanted to build an agent that doesn't just assist. One that acts.
This is what I learned about local vs cloud AI, and why I switched to Claude Code.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.
