Article
Robert Fico: Dividing Slovak Families Through Politics
Returning to Slovakia after spending time in Prague, I immediately felt the growing division that has gripped the nation. Under Robert Fico's leadership, policies such as questioning Slovakia's EU membership and shifting the country's foreign policy have polarized not only political discourse but also personal relationships. The result is a fractured society where even family gatherings often become battlegrounds for ideological clashes. While I strongly disagree with Fico's approach, this piece is not about his policies. Instead, it focuses on the societal rift that has widened under his leadership.
The fragmentation of information sources has created two parallel realities, where opposing groups interpret the political landscape through completely different lenses. This polarization has become a significant obstacle to constructive dialogue, leaving little room for mutual understanding.
I see this even within my own family. Increasingly, I question whether it is worth engaging in debates with relatives about their political views. Is the cost, whether it is heated arguments, sleepless nights, or strained relationships, worth it? For instance, is it worth upsetting my 85-year-old grandmother, who immediately ties any criticism of Robert Fico's government to her belief that younger generations are ungrateful? She often recalls how she had to make do with little in her youth, sewing her own clothes and managing everything on her own, and views today's generation as incapable of such self-reliance. Is it worth causing her sleepless nights or even raising her blood pressure over these discussions?
This raises a critical question: should we even discuss politics within our families? At first glance, this dilemma seems to present a painful choice between familial love and safeguarding the fundamental principles on which our republic and society are built.
Continue reading for free
Enter your email to keep reading for free. This also subscribes you to my monthly newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Who is Robert Fico and why is he controversial?
Why is Slovak society so deeply divided?
How does political polarisation in Slovakia compare to other European countries?
What role does media fragmentation play in Slovak politics?
How has Slovakia's foreign policy shifted under Fico since 2023?
Is political division in Slovakia affecting everyday life?
Related articles
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
It happens every day. It is happening right now.
Manipulation without the feeling of being manipulated is the most effective kind.
More articles
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.

I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.

I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Seventy per cent. That is where the first AI output begins, even when you give it the full company context and the best examples from the past. We are talking about the kind of output that cannot be defined programmatically. It is more complex. Often it is creative work. On one repeated type of output I reached eighty per cent within a week. Every further percentage point is harder than the one before.
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
A few days ago I interviewed a senior marketer. An experienced man, years of practice. I asked him about AI. He said he barely uses it. He had one bad experience with the output and decided he was too senior for it to add value when it is not perfect. I know the other side too: professionals who automate everything that can be automated.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement, knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing: the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.

Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.

