Article
What Is a Flow State? Flow, Hyperfocus, and Special Interests in a Neurodivergent Mind
When I talk to people about someone with certain unique traits, I often hear statements like, “You cannot deal with him, he is autistic.” Words associated with neurodivergence are used almost exclusively in a negative context.
To clarify, neurodivergent individuals are those whose cognitive and neurological processes differ from the average.
Let us first break down how these terms are commonly understood in today’s society, using autism as an example.
A quick definition before we do, because it is the thread running through everything below. What is a flow state? A flow state is a short-lived condition of complete absorption in an activity, first described by the psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, in which a clear goal, immediate feedback, and a balance between skill and challenge cause self-consciousness to fade, time to blur, and performance to peak. Flow, hyperfocus, and autistic special interests are routinely treated as one thing. They are three different things, and that confusion is where most of the misunderstanding begins.
Stereotypes and Misconceptions
Prejudices against people who exhibit traits commonly associated with neurodivergence often stem from stereotypes. The general perception tends to polarize: on one side, we have successful personalities like Elon Musk; on the other, the idea of individuals entirely "incapable" of functioning in society. The media plays a significant role in this. Movies and TV series often portray characters with autistic traits as genius outsiders.
Another layer of prejudice arises from the way autistic traits are framed as part of an autism spectrum disorder. Discussions revolve around illness, diagnosis, and treatment. Concepts become blurred, either everyone with certain traits is grouped with diagnosed autistics, including those who face significant challenges and cannot function independently (which is a separate topic I do not intend to downplay here), or there is an artificial and unhelpful categorisation of individuals with unique traits. There is an excessive and unnecessary effort to simplify this complex subject to create the illusion that we understand it. To me, this seems like the opposite of understanding. Complex questions do not have simple answers.
It is important to emphasise that not everyone who exhibits so-called autistic traits manifests all these characteristics, and if they do, it is to varying degrees. Moreover, not everyone who appears to exhibit an autistic trait is autistic. A unique way of experiencing and interacting with the world requires an individualized approach if we truly want to understand it.
Every person is unique. Some exhibit the traits listed below, while others are unique in different ways.
What Are Autistic Traits According to the World Health Organisation (WHO)?
To highlight an ongoing issue in modern practices, let us examine how autism is diagnosed in medical settings.
- Social Interaction Difficulties:
- Difficulty understanding and using nonverbal communication cues (e.g., eye contact, gestures, facial expressions).
- Lack of reciprocity in social relationships (e.g., sharing interests or emotions).
- Communication Challenges:
- Delayed or absent speech development without alternative communication methods (e.g., gestures).
- Echolalia (repetition of words or phrases).
- Problems initiating or maintaining a dialogue.
- Repetitive Behaviours and Interests:
- Strong fixation on routines or rituals.
- Repetitive movements.
- Limited or intense focus on specific topics or objects.
- Sensory Processing:
- Hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity to sensory inputs (e.g., sounds, lights, textures).
- Unusual reactions to sounds, colours, or physical touch.
- Cognitive and Emotional Behaviour:
- Difficulty understanding others' perspectives.
- Trouble adapting to changes or unexpected events.
When you read this, you may recognise yourself in some of these characteristics. However, this does not mean you are diagnosable as autistic, nor does it mean you have a condition that requires treatment. And it certainly does not mean that it is something that should disqualify you.
Flow State, Hyperfocus, and Special Interests: How They Differ
How do you get into a flow state? You do not summon flow on command, you arrange its conditions. In Csikszentmihalyi’s account you set a single clear goal, strip out interruptions, and pick a task that stretches your skill without overwhelming it, the narrow band between boredom and anxiety where attention locks on by itself. That is flow. Hyperfocus is the second state: it tends to seize you, often through a stimulus you did not plan, and it is not always productive. Special interests are the third: long-term fascinations that shape identity rather than a passing state. Telling these three apart is where most of the confusion starts.
Let us look at an example of how superficial understanding can lead to confusion in concepts. I am not autistic (I have no reason to think so), but that does not mean that someone looking at my past behaviour superficially could not find, for instance, signs of intense interest.
Continue reading for free
Enter your email to keep reading for free. This also subscribes you to my monthly newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
What is a flow state?
How do you get into a flow state?
Can a flow state be trained?
What is hyperfocus?
What does neurodivergent mean?
What is the difference between flow, hyperfocus, and special interests?
Can someone exhibit autistic traits without being autistic?
Why are media portrayals of autism misleading?
What are the WHO diagnostic criteria for autism?
Related articles
I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task, something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.
Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.
Manipulation without the feeling of being manipulated is the most effective kind.
More articles
I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Seventy per cent. That is where the first AI output begins, even when you give it the full company context and the best examples from the past. We are talking about the kind of output that cannot be defined programmatically. It is more complex. Often it is creative work. On one repeated type of output I reached eighty per cent within a week. Every further percentage point is harder than the one before.
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
A few days ago I interviewed a senior marketer. An experienced man, years of practice. I asked him about AI. He said he barely uses it. He had one bad experience with the output and decided he was too senior for it to add value when it is not perfect. I know the other side too: professionals who automate everything that can be automated.
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement, knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing: the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data (yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset), and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.
