Richard Golian

1995-born. Charles University alum. Head of Performance at Mixit. 10+ years in marketing and data.

#myjourney #myfamily #health #cognition #philosophy #digital #artificialintelligence #darkness #security #finance #politics #banskabystrica #carpathians

Castellano Français Slovenčina

Manage subscription Choose a plan

RSS
Newsletter
New articles to your inbox
Richard Golian

Hi, I am Richard. On this blog, I share thoughts, personal stories — and what I am working on. I hope this article brings you some value.

How I became a child again

An epistemological change

By Richard Golian

Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

I asked my mom, “Why?”

She answered, “Because.”

I asked again, “Why?”

She repeated, “Because it is so.”

And once more I pressed, “But why must it be so?”

And that was how I began to discover the world.

Later, when I started school, asking questions became more difficult: we studied hard, took exams, and handed in assignments—but that did not stop me from wanting to understand things more deeply.

Over time, I gradually stopped asking questions. I sought and accepted clear, true answers, convinced that everything was knowable.

Summary

School taught me certainty. I debated with conviction and absolute positions. Then, in my second university year, something shifted. From "I am convinced that" through "I think that" to "I am beginning to wonder." A return to a world without fixed truths. I became a child again.
Richard Golian

If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.

Common questions on this article's topic

What is epistemological development?
Epistemological development describes how people's understanding of knowledge itself changes over time. William Perry's model, developed at Harvard in the 1970s, traces a progression from dualism (believing in absolute right and wrong answers) through multiplicity (recognising multiple perspectives) to relativism (understanding that knowledge is contextual). In the article, this progression is experienced personally through the shift from debating with absolute conviction to asking whether questions can even be answered.
Is it possible to know what is truly knowable?
In the article, the honest answer is I do not know. This position is consistent with Socratic epistemology, where recognising the limits of one's knowledge is considered the beginning of wisdom rather than an intellectual failure. The point is not to claim that nothing can be known, but to approach knowledge with humility — understanding that certainty is rarer than we typically assume.