1995-born. Charles University alum. Head of Performance at Mixit. 10+ years in marketing and data.
Castellano Français Slovenčina
Manage subscription Choose a plan
Hi, I am Richard. On this blog, I share thoughts, personal stories — and what I am working on. I hope this article brings you some value.
The public debate on a united Europe is increasingly drifting into directions I no longer understand.
I am amazed at what we in Europe can seriously talk about, argue over, and let divide us. And I guarantee you, when someone in the future looks back at what we are doing today, they will rightfully call us fools.
Please, let us restart the public debate about Europe. From the ground up.
We understand the world first and foremost in practical terms. What affects us, we first grasp as something good, suitable for something — or, on the other hand, for example, as an obstacle.
So let us remind ourselves: why did we start uniting in Europe? What is the purpose of Europe, and is it fulfilling that purpose?
The Father of Europe, Robert Schuman, in the opening of his declaration that set European unification in motion, wrote:
“World peace cannot be safeguarded without the making of creative efforts proportionate to the dangers which threaten it.”
The entire declaration makes it explicitly clear that the purpose of European unification is peace. That the purpose of Europe is peace. And this peace is to be achieved by creating a system that makes armed conflict between its parts senseless:
“The solidarity in production thus established will make it plain that any war between France and Germany becomes not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible.”
Has it worked? Is the European Union fit and good for what it was created to achieve?
The answer is that armed conflict between EU member states is nonsensical and has never happened.
In this sense, Europe fulfills its purpose.
That is why we celebrate Europe Day. That is why I have a blue flag with yellow stars at home. I am proud of what we have achieved.
Are the debates that today appear in political struggles and divide Europe more important than this?
If not, why do we let ourselves be divided by them? Are we really so weak that we let ourselves be torn apart by some regulation or directive over absolute nonsense? If something bothers us, let us argue, change it, win elections, and fix what truly needs fixing. But I cannot understand how anyone could even think of destroying the foundation on which Europe stands. That I will never understand.
When I return to the opening thoughts of the Father of Europe’s declaration, they went even further — toward world peace:
“World peace cannot be safeguarded without the making of creative efforts proportionate to the dangers which threaten it.”
And even though the official European anthem is purely instrumental — so that no single language is favoured — its most widely sung version in Latin speaks clearly about world peace. The first stanza goes:
Est Europa nunc unita,
et unita maneat.
Una in diversitate,
pacem mundi augeat.
Which means:
Europe is united now,
and may it remain united.
United in diversity,
may it contribute to world peace.
Europe — at its very beginning and still today — was meant not just as a peace project within its own borders, but as a contribution to peace in the world. And in my view, that is something we should remind ourselves of more often — especially today, when we are still very far from that, and world peace seems to be getting further away.
What seems obvious to me is that we cannot achieve it without broader cooperation, at the very least with other world powers. That is the real problem. That is what we should be discussing — that is where we should focus our energy.
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
292