Article
What should I study in the age of AI? What should I major in? Does a degree still make sense?
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
The questions I weighed up when I chose what to study in 2015 are different from the ones people leaving secondary school weigh up today.
How I chose my field
When I was asking myself this question, in 2015, I considered that we live in a time in which fields of study appear and disappear quickly. And the fields that made sense to me were the ones time had tested, such as mathematics, physics and philosophy.
Which fields will exist but will need few people
Today is marked on top of that by progress in artificial intelligence. A person therefore has to consider which fields it makes no sense to study given the development of AI. Which fields will still exist, but where, thanks to AI, only a very small number of human specialists will be needed.
Already today we see far fewer job openings in some of the professions that are done on a computer. Companies are not making large redundancies, but they are no longer taking on new people.
Do you need a degree at all?
Today also raises the question of whether university study makes sense at all, of whether a person would not move forward faster on their own, without a university.
With these questions a person probably has to answer first what they want from studying at a university, whether it is job security, a higher salary, status, contacts, an extension of youth, knowledge, skills or habits. Or training for the mind, to keep it in good shape. Or you are simply driven by curiosity and you want to devote yourself fully to discovering new things. So first you have to answer the question of what you want, and only then can you answer the second question, whether university makes sense for you, and which university and which field.
To anyone whose aim is to secure employment through school, I recommend thinking about how they will be useful to society in the age of AI. It does not depend so much on whether they graduate from a university or not, but on whether they understand the world as it is today and can see where they can bring value to other people.
If your aim is something more than just job security, then I would start by looking at what this or that school, this or that field, can actually give me.
Which fields are the core and which are only derived from them
Even today I would choose, just as I did in 2015, according to which fields time has tested. They are at the same time fields that are not derived from anything else. The fact that we have such a number of technical fields today comes from their being derivations of physics and mathematics. The fact that we have so many fields in the humanities comes from their being a derivation of philosophy. These derived fields appear and disappear according to what society, industry and so on need. I was always interested in the fields that are the core of the derived ones, and that therefore do not disappear, such as physics, mathematics and philosophy.
Now the question is whether it makes sense to study these fields today as well, when AI can do research faster than any person.
Join the Library
Full access to my findings, personal stories, and what I learn from the people I meet.
Join the Library · €29.99 per year I Left My Job for Several Months to Read… How I Fell in Love With Her, at First… How do you stop depending on social media? Can… How to Start With AI in a Company: Automating… Fable 5 vs Opus: I Ran the Same Audit… I Ran Object Detection on My Laptop, and Saw…Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
What should I study in the age of AI?
Do you need a university degree at all?
Which professions are hiring fewer people today?
Is it worth studying a field where there will be few jobs?
How do I choose a university if contacts matter to me?
What stays with a person from university?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
LinkedIn
More articles
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.
I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.
I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Seventy per cent. That is where the first AI output begins, even when you give it the full company context and the best examples from the past. We are talking about the kind of output that cannot be defined programmatically. It is more complex. Often it is creative work. On one repeated type of output I reached eighty per cent within a week. Every further percentage point is harder than the one before.
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.