Article
Artificial Intelligence Is Too Artificial, but That Is Not a Problem
What AI can do, how I use it, what effect it will have on the world, how I try to adapt to the new world. I have written a lot about it. I need to arrange all those thoughts somehow, to simplify them. So that I have one compass that shows me the direction.
I have come to only one thing. The answer to artificial intelligence is something non-artificial. Artificial intelligence is artificial. We are surrounded by more and more artificial things. What I see value in, and where the value will probably be in the future, are non-artificial things. Mind you, that does not necessarily mean that they were created without artificial intelligence.
It may be like it is with plastic. Plastic is artificial. Plastic is cheap. Plastic is not worth much. No one likes plastic waste. But Lego is valuable, even though it is made of plastic. Why? Because there is life around Lego. Something very human and creative happens with Lego.
I think there is something very true in this parallel.
The answer is life.
My answer is life.
I recently wrote a manifesto for a living internet.
And I created Human filter, where I share authors and articles worth reading.
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
LinkedIn
Related articles
It cannot be done with 100% certainty. When I wrote about the dead internet theory, I wrote that we will no longer have certainty online and that for every verification tool there will be a tool that fools it. This is still true.
I see a lot of AI fatigue around me, loss of motivation and burnout. One example is a colleague who is leaving her job and says she plans to leave the digital marketing industry altogether.
Are you a content creator playing by the rules of YouTube, Instagram or Google? Are you a small business owner whose business model depends on how often Amazon recommends you, how expensive Facebook ad impressions will be or how expensive Google Ads clicks will be? If all or most of your contact with your audience or customers depends on a big platform showing you to them, you are not in a strong position.
More articles
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.
I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.
I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.