Article
Technological Europe: We Need Awareness, Investment, and a Winning Mentality
When we Europeans look at the technological world, we have many reasons to be proud. Yet, many Europeans feel that we lack major tech companies and innovative firms. What we are truly missing, however, is awareness. People often don't realise that many significant tech companies were founded right here.
- Spotify: Transformed the way we listen to music and became a global leader in streaming services.
- ASML: This Dutch company manufactures advanced lithography machines that enable the production of semiconductor chips. Without ASML, there would be no chips for smartphones, computers, cars, or artificial intelligence.
- SAP: Helps companies around the world manage their processes efficiently through advanced software.
- ESET: Provides cybersecurity for millions of users and is a global leader in protecting against digital threats.
- BlaBlaCar: Connects people for carpooling, changing the way we travel while promoting eco-friendly solutions.
- Mastodon: A decentralised social network that emphasises privacy, freedom of expression, and independence from corporations.
These are just a few examples proving that Europe is a hub of great ideas and solutions.
What Are We Missing?
One of the biggest challenges is a lack of a winning mentality. European innovators and entrepreneurs often lack the confidence we see in other parts of the world. We’re missing the determination not only to compete but also to win on the global stage. This mentality isn’t absent only among entrepreneurs. Today, with some honourable exceptions, it is missing across European society. We have become complacent.
It’s time to talk more about European products and services and highlight the contributions we can proudly present. By understanding our own success stories, we can use them as an inspirational resource for future scientists, entrepreneurs, and innovators.
Greater awareness will also help European companies attract not only customers but also investors, enabling them to grow faster. What we lack is a more active European capital market, one that focuses more on our own companies. Often, we invest overseas, not necessarily because North American companies are always better, but because they are better positioned in the media as technological leaders. Moreover, American companies are often overvalued, a topic I’ve discussed in more detail in my earlier articles. Our capital often fuels the growth of the biggest tech firms in the U.S. instead of supporting our own firms, and this needs to change.
Europe not only has potential but already boasts incredible tech companies shaping the future. To realise this potential, we need to raise awareness about our achievements, develop a more robust capital market, and create an environment that supports innovation. The future can be European, but only if we give it a chance.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Does Europe have significant tech companies?
Why is ASML so important?
Why does European capital flow to American companies instead of European ones?
What is the winning mentality that Europe lacks?
Are American tech companies overvalued compared to European ones?
What three things does Europe need to unlock its tech potential?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Related articles
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
We are heading toward a future where many things simply lose their value.
When someone loses their job, their sense of security collapses—so they sell their stocks.
More articles
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task — something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.
Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.
The moment other people needed access to it, the problem changed completely. It was no longer about whether the agent could learn. It was about who gets to teach it.
I wanted to build an agent that doesn't just assist. One that acts.
This is what I learned about local vs cloud AI, and why I switched to Claude Code.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.