1995-born. Charles University alum. Head of Performance at Mixit. 10+ years in marketing and data.
Castellano Français Slovenčina
Manage subscription Choose a plan
Hi, I am Richard. On this blog, I share thoughts, personal stories — and what I am working on. I hope this article brings you some value.
Since my early childhood, I have been an avid reader. Looking back, I consider myself an ideal child: asleep, playing alone, or immersed in books. Reflecting on this, not much has changed over the past 28 years.
Interestingly, I did not require a vast collection of books; I sought out the ones I found most intriguing. This approach seemed logical—why settle for less when you can enjoy the best available? Although I cannot recall the first book that captivated me, by the time I entered elementary school, a book about mammals had become my constant companion. I read it so frequently that the cover fell apart. I memorized facts about various mammals, including their characteristics and habitats.
However, the advent of the Internet marked a decline in my book reading. Technology utterly fascinated me, and at 12, I dedicated a summer to learning web development. This phase of my life, misunderstood by my family as mere gaming, was an enriching learning experience. I may share more about that period in a future post.
As I contemplated my university studies, despite my experience as a freelance web developer and creator of several projects, I grew disinterested in coding. I chose to study International Relations, Politics, and Philosophy at Charles University.
The preparation for university admissions led me to disconnect from the Internet and retreat to the science library in my hometown, Banská Bystrica. That year was one of the best in my life, offering me the tranquillity and time to delve into topics of great interest to me, such as the chronologies of critical historical events in Western civilization and the exploration of historical maps. This period felt like a rebirth.
My blog page originated shortly after, documenting my growing fascination with knowledge approaches and phenomenology, especially during my master's studies, which bridged science and philosophy.
My childhood habit of re-reading favourite books has persisted, leading me to revisit many titles multiple times, with plans to re-read especially compelling sections. I have ranked these books by my current preference.
This text offers Plato's rendition of Socrates' defence before his condemnation to death. I recommend it to everyone for its unparalleled impact on Western thought.
Engaging with this text was a formidable challenge, requiring two years of intensive study at Charles University, after which I felt I had barely scratched the surface—approach with caution due to its complexity.
This work comes with a dual warning: its complexity and the irreversible change in perspective it offers, primarily through its analysis of the Dialectic of Lord and Bondsman.
More than a discourse on faith, this work presents a reflective critique of the times, including the consequences of Hegel's rationality and the approach of modern science, offering a perspective that resonates beyond religious boundaries.
I recommend it to everyone. Read it!
A book that deepens the reader's understanding of philosophical and scientific discussions, suitable for readers across the spectrum of expertise.
It is a monumental text that I have engaged with extensively, revisiting specific passages nearly a hundred times. I caution potential readers about its complexity. It transcends ordinary understanding, requiring guidance from those experienced in Heidegger's thought.
I mentioned certain passages from this book in a post about the meaning of life in the age of artificial intelligence.
My copy, brimming with annotations and quotes from other Roman thinkers, is a testament to my journey with this book. I recommend it to everyone.
The first page has nothing to do with Marcus Aurelius. It is covered in quotes from Cicero and Quintilian that I wrote there before I even started reading.
Sine philosophia non posse effici quem quaerimus eloquentem. Without philosophy, one cannot become the orator we seek. Cicero. Then Quintilian: Quare non, ut intellegere possit, sed, ne omnino possit non intellegere, curandum. The concern is not that the listener might understand — but that he cannot possibly fail to understand.
Full access to my thoughts, personal stories, findings, and what I learn from the people I meet.
Join the Library
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
286