Article
Best Philosophy Books That Changed How I Think
Since my early childhood, I have been an avid reader. Looking back, I consider myself an ideal child: asleep, playing alone, or immersed in books. Reflecting on this, not much has changed over the past 28 years.
Interestingly, I did not require a vast collection of books; I sought out the ones I found most intriguing. This approach seemed logical—why settle for less when you can enjoy the best available? Although I cannot recall the first book that captivated me, by the time I entered elementary school, a book about mammals had become my constant companion. I read it so frequently that the cover fell apart. I memorized facts about various mammals, including their characteristics and habitats.
However, the advent of the Internet marked a decline in my book reading. Technology utterly fascinated me, and at 12, I dedicated a summer to learning web development. This phase of my life, misunderstood by my family as mere gaming, was an enriching learning experience. I may share more about that period in a future post.
End of High School and Return to Books
As I contemplated my university studies, despite my experience as a freelance web developer and creator of several projects, I grew disinterested in coding. I chose to study International Relations, Politics, and Philosophy at Charles University.
The preparation for university admissions led me to disconnect from the Internet and retreat to the science library in my hometown, Banská Bystrica. That year was one of the best in my life, offering me the tranquillity and time to delve into topics of great interest to me, such as the chronologies of critical historical events in Western civilization and the exploration of historical maps. This period felt like a rebirth.
My blog page originated shortly after, documenting my growing fascination with knowledge approaches and phenomenology, especially during my master's studies, which bridged science and philosophy.
Books That Most Changed My Outlook on Life and the World
My childhood habit of re-reading favourite books has persisted, leading me to revisit many titles multiple times, with plans to re-read especially compelling sections. I have ranked these books by my current preference.
- 8. Apology of Socrates (Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους) by Plato
This text offers Plato's rendition of Socrates' defence before his condemnation to death. I recommend it to everyone for its unparalleled impact on Western thought.
- 7. On the Essence of Truth (Vom Wesen der Wahrheit) by Martin Heidegger
Engaging with this text was a formidable challenge, requiring two years of intensive study at Charles University, after which I felt I had barely scratched the surface—approach with caution due to its complexity.
- 6. The Phenomenology of Spirit (Phänomenologie des Geistes) by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
This work comes with a dual warning: its complexity and the irreversible change in perspective it offers, primarily through its analysis of the Dialectic of Lord and Bondsman.
- 5. Practice in Christianity (Indøvelse i Christendom) by Søren Kierkegaard
More than a discourse on faith, this work presents a reflective critique of the times, including the consequences of Hegel's rationality and the approach of modern science, offering a perspective that resonates beyond religious boundaries.
- 4. Gorgias (Γοργίας) by Plato
I recommend it to everyone. Read it!
- 3. Truth and Method (Wahrheit und Methode) by Hans-Georg Gadamer
A book that deepens the reader's understanding of philosophical and scientific discussions, suitable for readers across the spectrum of expertise.
- 2. Being and Time (Sein und Zeit) by Martin Heidegger
It is a monumental text that I have engaged with extensively, revisiting specific passages nearly a hundred times. I caution potential readers about its complexity. It transcends ordinary understanding, requiring guidance from those experienced in Heidegger's thought.
I mentioned certain passages from this book in a post about the meaning of life in the age of artificial intelligence.
- 1. Personal writings by Marcus Aurelius
My copy, brimming with annotations and quotes from other Roman thinkers, is a testament to my journey with this book. I recommend it to everyone.
What My Copy of Marcus Aurelius Actually Looks Like
The first page has nothing to do with Marcus Aurelius. It is covered in quotes from Cicero and Quintilian that I wrote there before I even started reading.
Sine philosophia non posse effici quem quaerimus eloquentem. Without philosophy, one cannot become the orator we seek. Cicero. Then Quintilian: Quare non, ut intellegere possit, sed, ne omnino possit non intellegere, curandum. The concern is not that the listener might understand — but that he cannot possibly fail to understand.
Join the Library
Full access to my thoughts, personal stories, findings, and what I learn from the people I meet.
Join the Library — €29.99 per yearSummary
Common questions on this article's topic
What is Marcus Aurelius' Meditations about?
Why is Heidegger's Being and Time considered so important?
How can reading ancient philosophy change your perspective on modern life?
What is the Master-Slave dialectic in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Related articles
When we hear artificial intelligence, many people imagine something mysterious. Something that thinks. Something that understands. It does not. I work with AI every day and the more I use it, the clearer the truth becomes: artificial intelligence is applied mathematics. It predicts what the next word should be. That is the entire mechanism.
If I have learned anything from this experience, it is that my life is not driven by something predefined.
When this sense of meaning disappears, it leaves behind an emptiness that most people find difficult to bear.
More articles
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement — knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing — the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task — something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.
Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.