Article
When reflecting on my greatest strengths, I do not point to talent. As I have written before, I do not see myself as exceptionally gifted—I know people who are more talented than I am. But what drives my progress is something different: energy, perseverance, and the ability to reflect critically on my own actions.
I have already written about the importance of being critical of myself. Now, I would like to focus on perseverance, which I see as a natural outcome of two other traits: a forward-looking mindset and the ability to pick goals that are exciting enough to sustain my effort.
Long-Term Thinking and Strength from the Past
We live in a world that often champions the mantra of carpe diem, emphasising the importance of living in the moment. While I respect this perspective—and occasionally embrace it—my natural inclination is toward the future. For me, most actions I take today must have a purpose rooted in the long-term, which is typical for INTJ personality type.
At the same time, I draw strength from looking at the past. The blood of those who fought in the First and Second World Wars runs through my veins. My family history is rich with resilience and leadership. I see it in figures like my great-grandmother’s brother, a general, and the first political official to oppose the autocracy during the turbulent 1990s in Slovakia. It is also present in my immediate family—my father, who in his youth adeptly navigated Slovakia’s post-revolutionary economy, and my uncle, who led our hometown hockey club with resolve. And I could go on; there are many more examples that remind me of the strength and potential within my lineage.
This legacy inspires me to approach challenges with determination and confidence.
But looking to the past and future is not enough. Perseverance requires something more.
Continue reading
Enter your email to unlock this article and join the newsletter. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Is perseverance more important than talent?
Why does self-discipline feel effortless for some people?
How does family heritage contribute to personal resilience?
What is the relationship between long-term thinking and perseverance?
What does Seneca mean by to rule yourself is the ultimate power?
Can perseverance be developed or is it innate?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Related articles
These two steps are, right now, shaping my life and the direction I am heading in.
More articles
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task — something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.
Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.
The moment other people needed access to it, the problem changed completely. It was no longer about whether the agent could learn. It was about who gets to teach it.
I wanted to build an agent that doesn't just assist. One that acts.
This is what I learned about local vs cloud AI, and why I switched to Claude Code.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.