Article
Why AI adoption fails
Employees have the best AI models available at work, the connectors are hooked up, they know how to use them, and they have colleagues who already use them. And they still do not. To the point that before a meeting they will not write a single prompt to find the fundamental things in their own advertising account, and would rather risk that someone else spots the problems.
This is happening.
Recently, in a meeting, I found a campaign in an advertising account that someone had written off as ineffective. Among its ads was a video with very high potential on CTR and CPC. I had not seen numbers that good in that account for a long time. But it had not been shown to enough people, so the potential was nowhere near used. Nor even discovered, because the ad specialist had switched it off.
It would not have happened if the colleague had asked the AI model connected to their advertising account.
Why people do not use the AI they already have
When I talk to colleagues from different departments about how they work today, it is like visiting an open-air museum. I think to myself, it is 2026, nobody does these things by hand any more. Then I realise that yes, they do. Real AI adoption is at the very beginning, even in modern, technology-driven companies. In more conservative firms and state institutions it has often not even started.
It is not about time or AI skills. It is the inertia of old thinking. People simply do not stop and ask themselves whether they could do it differently, whether AI could help them with the task.
Understand that it is 2026
Everyone, please stop. Take a step back so you can see the whole of the work you do, the processes you are part of, and ask yourself how a machine could do that work for you. Which tools you need to connect to that machine. For example a newsletter tool, a graphics program or an advertising system. Whatever you need.
If you do not, someone who does will probably replace you.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Why does AI adoption fail when the tools are already there?
Why do people not use AI at work?
How do you start using AI at work?
Can AI check an advertising account?
Will AI replace me if I do not start using it?
How far along is AI adoption in companies?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
LinkedIn
Related articles
When you hear that artificial intelligence still does not deliver good enough output, that it is unusable for certain tasks, it is worth realising that this may no longer be true today. And even if it were, the most intelligent minds on this planet are working on making AI more useful. Most work activities will be automated. To understand where this is heading, some questions have to be asked.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
More articles
Are you a content creator playing by the rules of YouTube, Instagram or Google? Are you a small business owner whose business model depends on how often Amazon recommends you, how expensive Facebook ad impressions will be or how expensive Google Ads clicks will be? If all or most of your contact with your audience or customers depends on a big platform showing you to them, you are not in a strong position.
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.
I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.