Article
Automating Repetitive Work: What AI Takes, and What Stays Human
A few days ago, I posted this on social media:
"I heard an idea that stuck with me: Agricultural, industrial & digital revolutions made humans more like robots. The #AI revolution might finally let real robots do robotic work, so we can get back to being human. Not such a crazy thought."
The idea that artificial intelligence could, paradoxically, liberate us from robotic work imposed on us by past revolutions does not always land well with everyone. One commenter replied:
"Somewhat absurd logic. If labour had humanized apes, do I understand correct that handing labour over to robots would return humankind back down among the apes?"
To which I responded:
"The revolutions turned most jobs into repetitive tasks. Operators, accountants, salespeople. Before, beyond getting food, we did music, art, sex. I don’t get what the apes have to do with it."
And I got this reply:
"'I don’t get what the apes have to do with it.' Everything. Before we hand all the bullshit work over to the machines, we will cease being able to do everything that differentiates us apart from the apes..."
This exchange intrigued me so much that I decided to explore it further in this article.
How Agriculture, Industry, and Digitalisation Turned Human Work Into Robotic, Repetitive Tasks
Each revolution fundamentally reshaped the way we live and work.
The Agricultural Revolution taught us to function in cycles, tied to the land and seasons, requiring regularity and routine. Yet we could still live as relatively independent units.
The Industrial Revolution, however, anchored us more firmly into rigid structures. We became cogs in vast machines: factories, assembly lines, narrowly defined roles.
The Digital Revolution moved work onto screens, but the core principle remained the same: repetition, efficiency, performance. In many cases, humans behave like robots, and their work feels increasingly robotic.
Robotic Process Automation: Automating Office Spreadsheets and Reports
Thinking about my own profession, the most robotic part of my work lies in filling out spreadsheets and reports. That is why I push hard for automation, not because data are not important, but because I want to spend more time interpreting them rather than mechanically processing them.
The way things are developing, it is likely that even operational data interpretation will soon be handled by machines. In some industries, it is already happening. Companies will probably make strategic choices to delegate even more decisions to machines, especially in repetitive scenarios.
If I follow this line of thought, I realise that virtually every task I do with my mind could eventually be automated. Which brings me back to the main question: Could the AI revolution actually bring us back to a more human way of living?
Join the Library
Full access to my findings, personal stories, and what I learn from the people I meet.
Join the Library · €29.99 per year How a small business, creator or politician can be… What should I study in the age of AI?… I Left My Job for Several Months to Read… How I Fell in Love With Her, at First… How do you stop depending on social media? Can… How to Start With AI in a Company: Automating…Get the full article by email and feel free to reply if you want to discuss it further.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
How did past revolutions make human work more robotic?
Could AI actually reverse this trend and make work more human?
What does it mean to be human in the context of AI?
Will AI-generated art replace human art?
Did pre-industrial humans really spend more time on creative activities?
Is this vision realistic or just optimistic?
What is robotic process automation (RPA)?
What repetitive tasks can office automation and RPA take over?
What is the difference between robotic process automation and physical or humanoid robots?
Will automation free humans from boring, repetitive work?
Related articles
When you hear that artificial intelligence still does not deliver good enough output, that it is unusable for certain tasks, it is worth realising that this may no longer be true today. And even if it were, the most intelligent minds on this planet are working on making AI more useful. Most work activities will be automated. To understand where this is heading, some questions have to be asked.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
Employees have the best AI models available at work, the connectors are hooked up, and colleagues already use them. And they still do not. AI adoption fails even when the tools are already there. It is not about time or AI skills. It is the inertia of old thinking.
More articles
Are you a content creator playing by the rules of YouTube, Instagram or Google? Are you a small business owner whose business model depends on how often Amazon recommends you, how expensive Facebook ad impressions will be or how expensive Google Ads clicks will be? If all or most of your contact with your audience or customers depends on a big platform showing you to them, you are not in a strong position.
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.

I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.

I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.

Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.

