Article
AI and Cognitive Atrophy: What Happens When We Outsource Thinking
What Machines Did to Physical Labour
I recently heard an idea about the future that lodged itself in my mind and has not left since. It was about artificial intelligence and how it might reshape our need for mental effort. The thought came wrapped in an analogy from the past, what happened to physical labour when machines took over. We once had to be strong, fast, and alert just to survive, to hunt, to plant, to harvest. If you were not physically capable, you did not eat. Today, hardly anyone needs that ability. We are not out there hunting mammoths. Most people consume whatever the modern world offers, processed food stripped of real nutritional value. And only a small group voluntarily keeps their bodies in shape, out of an internal need. They go running, exercise, hike, even though survival no longer requires it.
Cognitive Offloading: What AI May Do to Thinking
And the idea that struck me is this: the same thing might happen to our mental world. We are entering an era where we may no longer need to know, understand, analyse, think, or create solutions, at least not to survive or fulfil our basic needs. AI will do it for us. And if we truly reach a point where, thanks to technology and automation, we no longer have to stretch our minds to meet our everyday needs, then the same story is likely to repeat itself. Most people will slip into a comfortable state of mental passivity, consuming rather than thinking.
Use It or Lose It: Mental Fitness and the Voluntary Minority
And only a few will choose to keep their minds in shape, reading, studying, creating, thinking, solving complex problems. Not because they have to, but because they want to.
It is a strange feeling. I have not fully processed it yet. Some might say we are already seeing this unfold. But I think what we are seeing now is just a faint preview of what is coming, and what is coming is still hard to imagine.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
What is the analogy between machines replacing physical labour and AI replacing mental effort?
Will AI make human thinking unnecessary?
Is mental passivity already happening?
What can individuals do to maintain mental fitness in the age of AI?
What is cognitive offloading?
What is cognitive atrophy?
Does relying on AI make us lazier or dumber?
Does the 'use it or lose it' principle apply to the brain?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
LinkedIn
Related articles
When you hear that artificial intelligence still does not deliver good enough output, that it is unusable for certain tasks, it is worth realising that this may no longer be true today. And even if it were, the most intelligent minds on this planet are working on making AI more useful. Most work activities will be automated. To understand where this is heading, some questions have to be asked.
One of my family members described a firm that has its data in several different tools, and its employees still join it by hand, in spreadsheets. That is the ordinary state of firms. When somebody tells such people not to do it by hand and to use AI, they will not understand. Most firms do not even have the basic connectors between the tools they use. These firms need help with AI transformation.
Employees have the best AI models available at work, the connectors are hooked up, and colleagues already use them. And they still do not. AI adoption fails even when the tools are already there. It is not about time or AI skills. It is the inertia of old thinking.
More articles
The development of artificial intelligence changes how we look at which paths in life make sense. Which studies and which profession to choose.
It was Thursday, 31 March 2022, when I handed over the last of my responsibilities to my colleagues, closed my laptop and went to the library. I left my job for several months and immersed myself in philosophy. And I am immensely grateful for it. Today I am, like most people, on a merry-go-round, and it is hard for me to stop and think about the fundamental questions of my own life.
It was September 2023. My life, my work, everything was completely different from now. It was simpler. I owned almost nothing. I needed to film an advert, I went up to a floor inside the company where the product I needed for that advert was, and there I noticed her for the first time. She laughs at me when I describe it like this, but at that moment the universe told me, that is her.
How and why I am gradually leaving social media and the big platforms. When I read that Meta is testing a new way to charge for organic posts that link outside its platform, it confirms how right I was to become steadily less dependent on the big platforms and on social media. It does not mean I have left them completely. It means that whether or not I stay in touch with my readers depends on them less and less, and today almost not at all.
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.
I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.
I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Seventy per cent. That is where the first AI output begins, even when you give it the full company context and the best examples from the past. We are talking about the kind of output that cannot be defined programmatically. It is more complex. Often it is creative work. On one repeated type of output I reached eighty per cent within a week. Every further percentage point is harder than the one before.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.