Article
My Hometown: Banská Bystrica
I come from Banská Bystrica, a town that might be considered small by European standards but holds a rich and diverse history.
The main reason for its importance was copper. Banská Bystrica became the production and administrative centre of the Thurzo–Fugger company, which was the largest copper enterprise in the world in its time.
Once known as Neusohl in German, it was a place where languages and cultures intertwined. In the Middle Ages, the town was primarily German-speaking, gradually evolving into a bilingual German-Slovak community, and later a trilingual one, incorporating Hungarian as well. This multicultural heritage is captured perfectly by Matthias Bel, one of the city’s most influential historical figures, who described himself as "lingua Slavus, natione Hungarus, eruditione Germanus", Slavic by language, Hungarian by nation, and German by education.
Today, Slovak is the predominant language spoken by the local population, yet the spirit of Central Europe’s past still lingers in the air. Walking through the city centre, you will hear not just Slovak, German, and Hungarian, but also Spanish, French, and other languages, reflecting a broader European identity. Many of the city’s high schools offer bilingual programs in German, French, English, and Spanish, with native speakers teaching these languages. Both my sister and I attended a Spanish-Slovak bilingual school, and being multilingual feels completely natural to me, as it does for many of the young people in our town.
Continue reading for free
Enter your email to keep reading for free. This also subscribes you to my monthly newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
What is Banská Bystrica known for historically?
Who was Matthias Bel?
What languages have been spoken in Banská Bystrica?
What is the Thurzo-Fugger Company?
Where is Banská Bystrica located?
Related articles

A few places close to my heart.

It is home to all the large Carpathian predators.

These two steps are, right now, shaping my life and the direction I am heading in.
More articles
The same task, two models. Fable 5 against Opus 4.8. On paper Fable is the better model, with a larger context and stronger specs. And still it lost. Opus handled the task with a single round of checking for 721,000 tokens, while Fable needed nine rounds and burnt through 2.78 million tokens. The difference was not in the model, but in how I set the task. And I know it, because I measured it.
A few weeks ago I installed a small local AI model on my laptop that watches a live camera feed. I turned the webcam on in the dark, and in near total darkness it recognised me and the objects in the room. That such things exist, I have known for a long time. What opened my eyes was the accessibility. I installed it in one prompt, free, and it runs entirely on my machine, sending data nowhere.

I once wrote about building my own privacy-friendly analytics tool. It had bot detection from the first version, yet it was not enough. Direct visits took a strangely high share of my traffic. When someone claims that 20% of their visits are bots and 80% are humans, I used to think the same. Today I would say the opposite ratio is closer to the truth. This is how I got there.

I have Heidegger and my notebook beside me. I am asking where all of this is heading, where artificial intelligence is taking us.
Seventy per cent. That is where the first AI output begins, even when you give it the full company context and the best examples from the past. We are talking about the kind of output that cannot be defined programmatically. It is more complex. Often it is creative work. On one repeated type of output I reached eighty per cent within a week. Every further percentage point is harder than the one before.
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
A few days ago I interviewed a senior marketer. An experienced man, years of practice. I asked him about AI. He said he barely uses it. He had one bad experience with the output and decided he was too senior for it to add value when it is not perfect. I know the other side too: professionals who automate everything that can be automated.
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement, knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing: the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.

Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.

