Richard Golian

1995-born. Charles University alum. Head of Performance at Mixit. 10+ years in marketing and data.

#myjourney #myfamily #health #cognition #philosophy #digital #artificialintelligence #darkness #security #finance #politics #banskabystrica #carpathians

Castellano Slovenčina

Manage subscription Choose a plan

RSS
Newsletter
New articles to your inbox
Richard Golian

Hi, I am Richard. On this blog I share my thoughts, not investment advice. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell securities.

Cyclical Opportunities in the Stock Market

Stock market cycles and investment timing

By Richard Golian

Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

Stocks and equity indices that receive the most attention in the media are showing increasingly lower returns when measured against the actual revenues or profits of the underlying companies. This discrepancy led me to start looking elsewhere – toward opportunities that are talked about far less.

Over time, I have been paying more and more attention to sectors that follow a certain internal logic and exhibit relatively recurring cycles. Cycles that are visible both in market behaviour and in the development of accounting data. In some cyclical sectors, stock prices can fall all the way down to book value, or very close to it. At such moments, the balance between risk and potential return begins to change for me. Not because I expect a quick rebound, but because at these levels further declines often become less likely. What tends to be more probable is either a prolonged period of stagnation or a turning of the cycle. To be clear: I am referring here to the book value of companies across an entire sector. I am interested in the sector as a whole, not in individual companies, as company-specific outcomes are usually far less predictable.

I therefore focus on the sector as a whole and its recurring cycles. Time plays a crucial role in this approach. Waiting for a cycle to turn, watching prices move sideways for months or even years, is ultimately a matter of discipline and patience. On the surface, nothing particularly interesting seems to be happening, and that is precisely what many people find most difficult. Paradoxically, however, this phase is psychologically easier for me than constantly moving from one “growth opportunity” to another.

Before I began to observe these types of situations more systematically, I tended to diversify more broadly across different growth sectors. Today, when I see a logically cyclical opportunity and prices are hovering around book value, I am more inclined to concentrate a larger portion of my portfolio.

Disclaimer

This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, or a guarantee of future market performance. The views expressed are solely those of the author, who may also be an investor. Investing in financial markets involves risk, and each reader should make their own decisions independently and, if necessary, consult with a licensed professional.

Summary

I shifted from diversified growth sectors to concentrated positions in cyclical stocks trading near book value. Waiting for cycles to turn may take months or years. I sleep more peacefully at cyclical bottoms than entering historically overvalued growth sectors.
Richard Golian

If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.

Common questions on this article's topic

What are cyclical stocks?
Cyclical stocks are shares of companies in sectors whose performance follows recurring economic patterns — expanding during growth periods and contracting during downturns. Common cyclical sectors include energy, materials, industrials, and financials. In the article, these sectors are described as exhibiting relatively recurring cycles visible both in market behaviour and in accounting data, making their patterns more analysable than those of growth sectors.
What is the price-to-book ratio and why does it matter for cyclical investing?
The price-to-book (P/B) ratio compares a company's market price to its book value — the net value of its assets on the balance sheet. When an entire sector's P/B approaches 1.0 or below, stocks are trading near or below the value of their tangible assets. In the article, this level is identified as a signal that the balance between risk and potential return begins to change — not because a rebound is guaranteed, but because further decline becomes less probable.
How does cyclical investing differ from growth investing?
Growth investing targets companies expected to increase earnings faster than the market, typically at high P/E valuations. Cyclical investing targets sectors trading at historically low valuations and waits for the cycle to turn. In the article, the comparison is psychological: buying at cyclical bottoms near book value provides more peace of mind than entering growth sectors at historically high P/E ratios amid widespread euphoria.
How long can a cyclical bottom last?
In the article, the honest answer is months or even years. Some cyclical sectors can linger near book value for extended periods before the cycle turns. This is described as requiring discipline and patience — and as the phase that most people find most difficult. Paradoxically, this waiting phase is described as psychologically easier than constantly chasing growth opportunities.
Should investors try to time the top of a cycle?
In the article, the answer is explicitly no. Predicting tops is not attempted. Sometimes a cycle produces a 50% increase, other times several multiples. The goal is not to catch the maximum but to exit with a reasonable profit. This approach accepts leaving some upside on the table in exchange for a more disciplined and repeatable process.
Is cyclical investing suitable for everyone?
The article does not present it as universal advice — it is explicitly described as a personal record of thinking, not investment recommendation. The approach requires comfort with extended periods of apparent inaction, willingness to concentrate capital in unpopular sectors, and the discipline to wait without external validation. For investors who need constant activity or who are uncomfortable holding positions through prolonged stagnation, this approach may not be suitable.