Richard Golian

1995-born. Charles University alum. Head of Performance at Mixit. 10+ years in marketing and data.

Castellano Français Slovenčina

Manage subscription Choose a plan

RSS
Newsletter
New articles to your inbox

Article

The Meaning of Life in the Age of Machines, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence

Meaning of life in AI age
Richard Golian
Richard Golian · 4 252 reads
Hi, I am Richard. On this blog, I share thoughts, personal stories — and what I am working on. I hope this article brings you some value.
Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

In my previous post, I reflected on what we need for a good life in an era increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence and automation. I concluded that it is meaning—today, tomorrow, and ten years from now. We need our lives and the world around us to have some sense of purpose, or at least for us to be on the path to finding it. When this sense of meaning disappears, it leaves behind an emptiness that most people find difficult to bear.

We typically find meaning in work, relationships, tasks, and hobbies. But what happens when most of these opportunities vanish? When machines and algorithms take over the majority of meaningful activities? When they perform most tasks better than we do? To what will we dedicate our time when the things that once gave our lives purpose become unnecessary? This emptiness arises not because we lack material things but because we lose what truly matters to us.

This feeling of emptiness is often referred to as anxiety.

The Phenomenon of Anxiety

I first became deeply interested in the concept of anxiety when I read Being and Time by Martin Heidegger during my university studies. It was challenging reading. In seminars, we dissected the text sentence by sentence. I had never encountered anything like it before, but the ideas this book offers are well worth the effort.

Heidegger describes anxiety as fundamental to existence—something that reveals the true nature of our being. Anxiety differs from ordinary fear. Fear always has a specific object—we fear illness, loss, or failure. Anxiety, however, has no specific object. In a state of anxiety, the world as a whole appears meaningless. Activities and relationships that we usually take for granted seem to lose their significance. This is not fear of something in the world; rather, it is a revelation of the fact that our being is our own responsibility, with no predetermined purpose.

Heidegger explains that anxiety confronts us with the state of Geworfenheit (thrownness)—the realisation that we have been thrown into the world without our consent, without a clear guide on how to live within it. This recognition forces us to confront our freedom and responsibility, reminding us that no external framework provides the meaning we seek.

A key aspect of Heidegger’s conception of anxiety is that it grants us access to authentic being. When we recognise that our time is finite—we gain the opportunity to live on our own terms, rather than according to societal expectations. Anxiety, therefore, is not merely an uncomfortable state but a crucial moment of clarity in which we can reclaim the direction of our lives.

In the digital age, where algorithms and machines manage all practical matters, a unique challenge emerges. When everyday obligations that once distracted us disappear, we are left with only ourselves and one pressing question: What now?

In my view, we will stand at a crossroads. One path is to seek out new, meaningful activities. The other is to embrace anxiety and the questions and challenges it brings. Perhaps it is this second path that will ultimately lead us to a good and truly authentic life.

Ignoring these paths takes us somewhere too—just not where we would want to go. The question is how many people will follow other directions. I can imagine a future, a world where living a good life will not be that easy.

Continue

Join the Library

Full access to my thoughts, personal stories, findings, and what I learn from the people I meet.

Join the Library — €29.99 per year
Or just this article · €2,99

Get the full article by email and feel free to reply if you want to discuss it further.

Visa Mastercard Apple Pay Google Pay

Sources

Edmund Husserl, founder of phenomenology, taught at the University of Freiburg: University of Freiburg

Summary

When machines handle all practical matters, what gives life meaning? This article draws on Heidegger's concept of existential anxiety — the moment when the world as a whole reveals its apparent meaninglessness. Not as despair, but as an opening. In an era of algorithms and automation, the question is no longer what to do. It is why to do anything at all.

Common questions on this article's topic

What is existential anxiety according to Heidegger?
Heidegger describes anxiety (Angst) as a fundamental aspect of human existence that differs from ordinary fear. While fear always has a specific object — illness, loss, failure — anxiety has no direct object. In anxiety, the world as a whole appears meaningless, and activities we usually take for granted lose their significance. For Heidegger, this is not a disorder but a moment of clarity that reveals the true structure of our being.
What is the difference between anxiety and fear in philosophy?
Fear is always directed at something specific — a threat, a danger, a possible loss. Anxiety, in the philosophical sense developed by Heidegger, has no identifiable object. It is not fear of something in the world but a confrontation with the groundlessness of existence itself. This distinction matters because anxiety cannot be resolved by removing a specific threat — it requires a deeper reckoning with how we relate to our own lives.
What is Geworfenheit (thrownness)?
Geworfenheit is Heidegger's term for the condition of being thrown into the world without consent and without a predetermined guide on how to live. We did not choose to exist, yet we find ourselves here — shaped by biology, culture, and circumstances we never selected. Recognising this forces us to confront our own freedom and responsibility, since no external framework automatically provides the meaning we seek.
How could AI and automation cause a crisis of meaning?
We typically find meaning through work, relationships, tasks, and hobbies. If machines and algorithms take over the majority of these activities, many people may face a void — not because they lack material things, but because they lose what gave their lives purpose. Psychologists have begun identifying concerns about human value and professional identity in an automated future as a growing source of anxiety distinct from ordinary job insecurity.
Can existential anxiety be a positive experience?
According to Heidegger, yes. Anxiety grants access to authentic being. When we recognise that our time is finite and that no external structure provides meaning automatically, we gain the opportunity to live on our own terms rather than according to societal expectations. In the article, anxiety is presented not merely as an uncomfortable state but as a crucial moment of clarity in which we can reclaim the direction of our lives.
How can we find meaning in the age of artificial intelligence?
The article presents two paths: seeking out new meaningful activities that cannot easily be automated, or embracing the questions that anxiety brings and using them as a foundation for authentic living. The danger lies in a third, quieter path — adopting pre-packaged worldviews and letting others define our purpose, which makes us vulnerable to manipulation and ideological capture.
Richard Golian

If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.

NEWSLETTER
What I write about, what I am working on, what I learned.
Sent the first Sunday of the month. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related articles

Is AI Making Us Dumber?

I have conducted roughly one hundred and fifty practical interviews over the past four years. Fifty for data specialist roles. A hundred for advertising and performance marketing specialists. Almost every one of them involved sitting down with a candidate over a practical task — something close to a real problem we actually need to solve at the company. Not theory. Not trivia. Applied problem-solving. Over time, I started noticing a pattern.

14 April 2026·672 reads
What AI Hides From You

Before you can teach AI to understand anything, you need to see what it is hiding from you.

11 April 2026·672 reads
How Is AI Different from Human Intelligence?

When we hear artificial intelligence, many people imagine something mysterious. Something that thinks. Something that understands. It does not. I work with AI every day and the more I use it, the clearer the truth becomes: artificial intelligence is applied mathematics. It predicts what the next word should be. That is the entire mechanism.

22 March 2025·2 106 reads

More articles

Where the Money Goes When AI Takes the Work

Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.

15 May 2026·99 reads
Building an AI Stock Market Prediction System That Grades Itself

I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.

26 April 2026·612 reads
AI sales forecast: 9 traps so far

Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.

25 April 2026·583 reads
Will AI take my job?

Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.

23 April 2026·365 reads
€50,000 Quote vs. Two Hours with Claude Code

One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.

18 April 2026·722 reads
When Your AI Agent Joins the Team

The moment other people needed access to it, the problem changed completely. It was no longer about whether the agent could learn. It was about who gets to teach it.

8 April 2026·826 reads
Training an AI Agent That Learns Between Sessions

I wanted to build an agent that doesn't just assist. One that acts.

4 April 2026·876 reads
Local AI Model Limitations: Why I Switched from Ollama to Claude for Autonomous Agents

This is what I learned about local vs cloud AI, and why I switched to Claude Code.

3 April 2026·1 477 reads
Full AI agents or fully offline.

Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.

10.5.2026·323 reads
NEWSLETTER
What I write about, what I am working on, what I learned.
Sent the first Sunday of the month. Unsubscribe anytime.