Article
Technological Europe: We Need Awareness, Investment, and a Winning Mentality
When we Europeans look at the technological world, we have many reasons to be proud. Yet, many Europeans feel that we lack major tech companies and innovative firms. What we are truly missing, however, is awareness. People often don't realise that many significant tech companies were founded right here.
- Spotify: Transformed the way we listen to music and became a global leader in streaming services.
- ASML: This Dutch company manufactures advanced lithography machines that enable the production of semiconductor chips. Without ASML, there would be no chips for smartphones, computers, cars, or artificial intelligence.
- SAP: Helps companies around the world manage their processes efficiently through advanced software.
- ESET: Provides cybersecurity for millions of users and is a global leader in protecting against digital threats.
- BlaBlaCar: Connects people for carpooling, changing the way we travel while promoting eco-friendly solutions.
- Mastodon: A decentralised social network that emphasises privacy, freedom of expression, and independence from corporations.
These are just a few examples proving that Europe is a hub of great ideas and solutions.
What Are We Missing?
One of the biggest challenges is a lack of a winning mentality. European innovators and entrepreneurs often lack the confidence we see in other parts of the world. We’re missing the determination not only to compete but also to win on the global stage. This mentality isn’t absent only among entrepreneurs. Today, with some honourable exceptions, it is missing across European society. We have become complacent.
It’s time to talk more about European products and services and highlight the contributions we can proudly present. By understanding our own success stories, we can use them as an inspirational resource for future scientists, entrepreneurs, and innovators.
Greater awareness will also help European companies attract not only customers but also investors, enabling them to grow faster. What we lack is a more active European capital market, one that focuses more on our own companies. Often, we invest overseas, not necessarily because North American companies are always better, but because they are better positioned in the media as technological leaders. Moreover, American companies are often overvalued, a topic I’ve discussed in more detail in my earlier articles. Our capital often fuels the growth of the biggest tech firms in the U.S. instead of supporting our own firms, and this needs to change.
Europe not only has potential but already boasts incredible tech companies shaping the future. To realise this potential, we need to raise awareness about our achievements, develop a more robust capital market, and create an environment that supports innovation. The future can be European, but only if we give it a chance.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Does Europe have significant tech companies?
Why is ASML so important?
Why does European capital flow to American companies instead of European ones?
What is the winning mentality that Europe lacks?
Are American tech companies overvalued compared to European ones?
What three things does Europe need to unlock its tech potential?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Related articles
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing — the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
More articles
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
A few days ago I interviewed a senior marketer. An experienced man, years of practice. I asked him about AI. He said he barely uses it. He had one bad experience with the output and decided he was too senior for it to add value when it is not perfect. I know the other side too — professionals who automate everything that can be automated.
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement — knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.