Article
When reflecting on my greatest strengths, I do not point to talent. As I have written before, I do not see myself as exceptionally gifted—I know people who are more talented than I am. But what drives my progress is something different: energy, perseverance, and the ability to reflect critically on my own actions.
I have already written about the importance of being critical of myself. Now, I would like to focus on perseverance, which I see as a natural outcome of two other traits: a forward-looking mindset and the ability to pick goals that are exciting enough to sustain my effort.
Long-Term Thinking and Strength from the Past
We live in a world that often champions the mantra of carpe diem, emphasising the importance of living in the moment. While I respect this perspective—and occasionally embrace it—my natural inclination is toward the future. For me, most actions I take today must have a purpose rooted in the long-term, which is typical for INTJ personality type.
At the same time, I draw strength from looking at the past. The blood of those who fought in the First and Second World Wars runs through my veins. My family history is rich with resilience and leadership. I see it in figures like my great-grandmother’s brother, a general, and the first political official to oppose the autocracy during the turbulent 1990s in Slovakia. It is also present in my immediate family—my father, who in his youth adeptly navigated Slovakia’s post-revolutionary economy, and my uncle, who led our hometown hockey club with resolve. And I could go on; there are many more examples that remind me of the strength and potential within my lineage.
This legacy inspires me to approach challenges with determination and confidence.
But looking to the past and future is not enough. Perseverance requires something more.
Continue reading
Enter your email to unlock this article and join the newsletter. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Summary
Common questions on this article's topic
Is perseverance more important than talent?
Why does self-discipline feel effortless for some people?
How does family heritage contribute to personal resilience?
What is the relationship between long-term thinking and perseverance?
What does Seneca mean by to rule yourself is the ultimate power?
Can perseverance be developed or is it innate?
If you have any thoughts, questions, or feedback, feel free to drop me a message at mail@richardgolian.com.
Related articles
These two steps are, right now, shaping my life and the direction I am heading in.
More articles
For a long time we treated the internet as the main road. The place where work and relationships happen. Yet most of what we see on it today is, or soon will be, AI-generated: text, images, profiles and comments. The internet is turning into an online game full of bots, where you cannot be sure that a human is on the other side of anything. So I ask: was the online world the main road, or only a temporary detour that part of us will return from, back offline?
A few days ago I interviewed a senior marketer. An experienced man, years of practice. I asked him about AI. He said he barely uses it. He had one bad experience with the output and decided he was too senior for it to add value when it is not perfect. I know the other side too — professionals who automate everything that can be automated.
Europe does not have the capacity to face a full-scale, mass drone war of the kind we see in Ukraine. Three dependencies weaken it: China supplies the physical material for defence systems, the United States supplies capabilities Europe does not have, and twenty-seven states cannot agree how fast, or who pays. Rearmament plans exist, but they are being carried out slowly.
AI produces the graphic, the newsletter and the product page faster than a person. What is left for the one who used to do it is the judgement — knowing whether the output is good. But most people have worse judgement than AI. And whoever cannot judge quality cannot delegate either. How do you tell whether yours is the judgement a company relies on, or the kind it can replace?
In April, in the first part of this series, I wrote about an AI prediction system I had started building on my own machine. At the time the software was a few hours old and the prediction record was empty. The record since then has shown one thing — the system does not yet understand the market it is being asked to forecast. It can pull macro context, book value, earnings. But it cannot put those together into something that helps it understand the price.
Prague, 13 May 2026. On my way to work I started thinking about something that stayed with me for days. If most routine work on a computer disappears in the next ten years, and a large share of repetitive manual work disappears with it, what happens to the flow of money? Who pays whom for what? Which economic layers will exist, how large will they be, and what relationships will run between them? This is the six-layer map I sketched as an answer.
I am building an AI system to predict the S&P 500. It runs on my own machine, uses free public data — yfinance, FRED, the Shiller dataset — and grades every forecast against reality. This series documents the build itself: the decisions, the methodology, the mistakes. What I will eventually share from the running system is a separate question, and an honest one.
Yesterday I could not tear myself away from the computer. When I lifted my head, it was half past eight in the evening. I had been sitting alone upstairs for about three hours.
Will AI take my job? A certified Google trainer told me in June 2024 that my profession would cease to exist. Twenty-two months later, my job title has not changed — but ninety percent of what I do during the day is different. I have delegated more of my thinking to AI agents than I thought possible. I am not afraid. This is why, and what it means for anyone asking the same question.
One hour. Fifty-five minutes. That is how long it took to build what a Czech software firm had quoted at over €50,000. I built it with Claude Code. Not a prototype. Not a proof of concept. A working tool — the one the company actually needed. By the evening of the same day, it was running on staging. This is not about Claude Code. It is about what Claude Code exposes.
Four days in Catalonia. No computer, no AI, almost no social media. I bought this notebook so that I could write down what I would think about, and what I would come across and learn on the trip.